Wikkit wrote:
The new format is very.... MacOS X-ish. I like the new features, but I'm afrad that someday I'm going to wake up and absolutely everything will be soft, fluffy, and covered in pastel gradients.
I hadn't quite thought of it as OS X-like, but I see where you're coming from. Much of the basic style comes from the standard "subSilver" template for the forum (which can be seen in action
here) which is quite warm and fuzzy, dispite being a cool color. I removed some of the more blatent color gradiations and changed all links to have a proper underline (adding the ability to have links that aren't underlined is, in my opinion, a violation of basic web usability), but overall I find the new look to be pleasing (well, duh! I am the one who installed this forum).
If Apple would come to their senses and realize how much money they could make by releasing a version of their OS that would run on a PC, I'd be among the first to buy one.
Wikkit wrote:
P.S.: At the top it says "Font colour:" and then a dialog, and on the line below it says "Font color:" and instructions how to do it in BBCode. Is it a multiple personality script, one part brit and one part merkin?
Yeah, the phpBB team is spread out all over the place, so that explains the spelling difference. To be pedantic about it, though, it's probably correct, because while non-American English speakers write "colour", HTML & CSS use the Americanized "color"
Good morning! That's a nice tnetennba.