Comics, Economic, and failed success stories.
Posted: Wed Mar 13, 2013 8:17 am
I've seen many comic artists on this page wanting $40 per page.
http://www.jimzub.com/?p=1953
Note: I haven't actually seen anyone hire them... but I've seen a lot of people asking. Actually, based on this 'success' story that's impossible. The author gives speeches, and is invited to talk about his success. And yet he... the team... as a whole makes less than what many artists on this forum ask for.
I ask you, if a successful comic cannot afford to hire the artists on this forum.. are people's expectations wrong?
Worse yet, that's how much they'd get if they got 100%. Remember, there's also the Inker, the Letterer, and the Writer to pay. Admittedly, this isn't factoring in digital sales. But even factoring in digital sales.
Some writers I've seen aren't actually targeting a profit. They're doing it fot the 'sake of the art' never intending to make a dime. So, what then? The artist, in spite of owning half the work, works for free or at a steep discount... not only hoping that the comic will be successful.
You can earn an artist... but if he's working for free/cheap and doesn't feel like doing something, what recourse do you have? Honestly, in such a situation I usually laugh and let the other party tank the comic. (It is, after all, his own success he's destroying.) If he's a pro and you're not. (There is a reason many pro's don't succeed on their own.)
Then there's the dilution of rights to multiple parties that limits the end work to what they can all agree on. (Read up on the 'League of Nations' sometime). It's no wonder that the few to succeed (and make no mistake, there are very FEW at the top) are the ones who work for major companies OR the ones who can BOTH write and draw.
Also, one small question, a lot of indie comics seem to use a black background panel. Has anyone bothered to analyze the average profit margins of comics with a specific style of background? (Black vs. Black line with white gap?)
The thing is, a lot of comics seem to be closing. It's no wonder some companies own so many characters. Just wait until they go broke and buy em up! In fact, it seems fairly common for a comic book publisher to close doors and (potentially) lose rights.
And if they succeed, since they are constantly under the threat of imminent doom, their best economic bet is to sell out. And then this happens.
http://www.avclub.com/articles/marvel-f ... g-h,69202/
By the way, he almost lost his house because SOMEONE hit him with 17000 dollars in debt for... yeah...
http://news.moviefone.com/eric-larnick/ ... 82549.html
His level of complete ownership is debated by...
Unfortunately, there aren't accurate records from forty years ago, so it's a mater of hearsay.
But, this thread isn't to deal with 'ghost rider' (If you want to do that, please start another one.) I just wanted to point out the many possible consequences.
I've got to go, work, more later.
Basically, the economics are painful. Artists who work on 'creator owned' works seem to net less, even as a success, than they are asking. It makes sense, the lowest paid person at a restaurant nearby is the owner.
http://www.jimzub.com/?p=1953
Note: I haven't actually seen anyone hire them... but I've seen a lot of people asking. Actually, based on this 'success' story that's impossible. The author gives speeches, and is invited to talk about his success. And yet he... the team... as a whole makes less than what many artists on this forum ask for.
I ask you, if a successful comic cannot afford to hire the artists on this forum.. are people's expectations wrong?
Worse yet, that's how much they'd get if they got 100%. Remember, there's also the Inker, the Letterer, and the Writer to pay. Admittedly, this isn't factoring in digital sales. But even factoring in digital sales.
Some writers I've seen aren't actually targeting a profit. They're doing it fot the 'sake of the art' never intending to make a dime. So, what then? The artist, in spite of owning half the work, works for free or at a steep discount... not only hoping that the comic will be successful.
You can earn an artist... but if he's working for free/cheap and doesn't feel like doing something, what recourse do you have? Honestly, in such a situation I usually laugh and let the other party tank the comic. (It is, after all, his own success he's destroying.) If he's a pro and you're not. (There is a reason many pro's don't succeed on their own.)
Then there's the dilution of rights to multiple parties that limits the end work to what they can all agree on. (Read up on the 'League of Nations' sometime). It's no wonder that the few to succeed (and make no mistake, there are very FEW at the top) are the ones who work for major companies OR the ones who can BOTH write and draw.
Also, one small question, a lot of indie comics seem to use a black background panel. Has anyone bothered to analyze the average profit margins of comics with a specific style of background? (Black vs. Black line with white gap?)
The thing is, a lot of comics seem to be closing. It's no wonder some companies own so many characters. Just wait until they go broke and buy em up! In fact, it seems fairly common for a comic book publisher to close doors and (potentially) lose rights.
And if they succeed, since they are constantly under the threat of imminent doom, their best economic bet is to sell out. And then this happens.
http://www.avclub.com/articles/marvel-f ... g-h,69202/
By the way, he almost lost his house because SOMEONE hit him with 17000 dollars in debt for... yeah...
http://news.moviefone.com/eric-larnick/ ... 82549.html
His level of complete ownership is debated by...
Unfortunately, there aren't accurate records from forty years ago, so it's a mater of hearsay.
But, this thread isn't to deal with 'ghost rider' (If you want to do that, please start another one.) I just wanted to point out the many possible consequences.
I've got to go, work, more later.
Basically, the economics are painful. Artists who work on 'creator owned' works seem to net less, even as a success, than they are asking. It makes sense, the lowest paid person at a restaurant nearby is the owner.